Case information is buried
Discovery may contain thousands of documents, emails, scans and recordings. Staff lose hours uploading files, searching folders and verifying where information came from.
Find source-linked answers across case files and prepare complete client intake. Private AI systems built around your firm's data, with your team in control.
Free initial review$2,500 pilotTwo weeksProduction scoped separately.
Where was the blue Honda before the delivery?
The deposition places a blue Honda on the east side of the lot before the delivery arrived.
“…a blue Honda was parked along the east side of the lot before the delivery arrived…”
This excerpt does not establish who owned or drove the vehicle. Those details remain unconfirmed.
Evidence you can inspect. Conclusions for your team.
Discovery may contain thousands of documents, emails, scans and recordings. Staff lose hours uploading files, searching folders and verifying where information came from.
Legal teams repeatedly ask the same questions, chase missing documents and reorganize incomplete information before an attorney can evaluate the matter.
Point the system at a discovery folder and let it process, organize and index the collection. Attorneys can search across the matter and ask questions that are answered only from the underlying evidence.
Find every reference to the blue Honda and identify the supporting documents.
“…a blue Honda was parked along the east side of the lot before the delivery arrived…”
“Vehicle described by witness as a blue Honda sedan, partial plate recorded.”
“Confirming the Honda was returned to the yard that evening—see photos.”
iWhen the evidence does not support an answer, the system says so instead of filling the gap.
A voice or web assistant conducts structured intake in the client's preferred language, asks relevant follow-up questions and prepares a clear summary for the legal team.
Buenas tardes, tuve un accidente de trabajo la semana pasada.
Gracias por avisarnos. ¿Reportó el accidente a su supervisor y recibió atención médica?
Sí, fui a la clínica el mismo día. Tengo el reporte.
Client reports a workplace injury, notified supervisor, treated same day, and has the clinic report available to upload.
Deploy around the firm's security, storage and access requirements.
Answers must be supported by identifiable source documents.
The system organizes and assists. Attorneys retain legal judgment and approval.
The firm maintains control of its data, with source-code ownership available when required.
The system does not independently provide legal advice or make legal decisions.
Finding an answer is only half the work; attorneys still need to verify it. Test source-linked search over a bounded collection before committing to a larger platform.
What we could improve togetherImprove case-file organization, source-linked search, and review preparation—or prioritize client intake and staff handoffs. We agree on a useful combination of legal-team improvements and representative material to test.
We agree on success criteria before building, then document the results, limitations, and recommended next steps. No promised savings or obligation to proceed to production.
Select the workflow, information sources and review requirements.
Deliver a working pilot using representative firm data.
Measure accuracy, time saved and what should move into production.
The pilot can cover related workflows and improvements. We agree on priorities and deliverables together to fit the two-week engagement.
No. It organizes information, supports search and intake, and prepares material for review. Attorneys retain legal judgment and decision-making authority.
Yes, when the files are suitable for processing. Scans can be OCR-processed and indexed, and supported answers can link back to the underlying document and location.
Storage, access, retention, and deployment are designed around the firm's requirements. Those boundaries are agreed before any live matter or client data is connected.
The proposed search workflow should say that supporting evidence was not found and show the material it retrieved for review. It must not fill the gap with an invented citation. The pilot includes unanswered and ambiguous questions so attorneys can assess the limits alongside supported answers.
Tell us what is stuck. We will assess whether it is practical to solve and explain the most sensible next step.
Detailed workflow mapping, technical design, and implementation begin with a paid engagement.
We will read your description and reply within one business day.